Approaches to legal matters

What makes one approach different from another?

Legal services vary in structure, cost, and communication. This page sets out how different routes compare — not to disparage alternatives, but to help you make a considered choice.

Back to home

Why comparison matters here

Legal assistance in Japan is available through several channels: large law firms, solo practitioners, judicial scriveners, administrative scriveners, and certified specialists. Each is authorised to handle different types of work under Japanese law, and each has a different cost structure and mode of communication.

For civil, corporate, and property matters of moderate complexity — the kind most individuals and small businesses encounter — the differences in approach often matter more than formal credentials. The sections below address those differences directly.

Traditional approach compared with ours

Area	Typical traditional route	Fumidai
Fee structure	Hourly billing; scope and total often unclear at the outset	Fixed fee per service, stated before work begins
Language of communication	Japanese primary; English available at extra cost or not at all	English and Japanese equally throughout
Who handles the matter	Often distributed across junior staff after initial meeting	Same person throughout, from first inquiry to completion
Initial assessment	Sometimes provided, often billed at standard rate	Written assessment of position provided before commitment
Minimum engagement	Often requires retainer or minimum hours	Per-matter engagement, no ongoing retainer required
Explanation of process	Variable; often technical and not always in plain terms	Each step explained in plain language as it proceeds

What distinguishes this practice

Document checklist prepared for your situation

Before any meeting, we send a checklist specific to your matter type — not a generic list, but one built around what the relevant authority or counterparty will require. This reduces the back-and-forth that makes even straightforward matters drag.

Process outline with realistic durations

Each stage is described as a plain numbered sequence, with time estimates given as ranges rather than single figures. External steps — bureau processing, overseas authorities — are shown separately so you can see which delays are within our control and which are not.

Assessment before any commitment

We review your documents and circumstances and give you a written assessment of your position — including whether we think proceeding is worthwhile — before any fee beyond the initial review. If we do not think our involvement adds value, we say so.

Referral when a matter falls outside scope

If your matter requires a registered attorney or falls outside what this practice handles, we say so at the first opportunity and, where possible, suggest where to look. We do not take on work to avoid losing a fee.

How results compare across approaches

For the matters within our scope — residency documentation, consumer contract questions, and documentary procedures — outcomes are largely determined by the quality of preparation, not by the size or prestige of the practice handling it. Most applications and submissions follow defined procedural paths. Getting them right depends on knowing those paths, preparing documentation to standard, and catching problems before submission.

PREPARATION

Document checklist prepared for the specific application type. Supporting statements reviewed before submission. Common omissions identified in advance.

ASSESSMENT

Prospects assessed plainly before work begins. If the application or claim is weak, that is communicated clearly so you can decide whether to proceed.

TRANSPARENCY

Where a matter is better resolved through a consumer centre, the immigration bureau directly, or another public route, that is noted — even where our involvement would not add proportionate value.

Thinking about cost and value

Hourly billing is the standard model in most legal practices, and it is appropriate for complex litigation or matters where the scope genuinely cannot be determined in advance. For the administrative and advisory work we handle — which follows more defined procedural paths — a fixed fee is more straightforward for both sides.

Fixed fee — what it means in practice

Fee known before any work begins
No additional charge for correspondence within scope
No incentive to extend the engagement
Clear boundary on what is included

Current fees by service

Residency and Visa Documentation ¥32,000
Consumer Contract Advice ¥17,000
Document Certification and Procedures ¥20,000

All fees in Japanese yen and inclusive of standard correspondence. Third-party costs such as notarial fees or government charges are separate.

What the experience of each approach looks like

Typical traditional route

Initial meeting billed at standard rate, outcome of the meeting determined after the fact
Matter passed to associate or junior after engagement begins
Updates provided when initiated by the client; billing increments per communication
Japanese-language documentation translated separately at additional cost
Final invoice sometimes higher than expected

Working with Fumidai

Written assessment of your position before any fee is incurred beyond initial review
Same person from first contact through to completion
Each stage explained as it is reached; updates without being prompted
English and Japanese equally throughout; no extra charge for either
Fee agreed in advance; invoice matches what was stated

Results over time

Many legal matters — particularly residency applications — are not one-time events. A change of status leads eventually to a renewal, a renewal to a permanent residency application. How the first matter is handled creates the record on which subsequent applications rest.

We document each engagement so that if you return for a related matter, there is no need to reconstruct the background. The record of what was submitted, when, and on what basis stays with us and can be provided to you in full on request.

Some points that come up frequently

"I can do this myself through the bureau."

Many applications can be handled directly. Where that is clearly the case, we say so in the initial assessment. We handle preparation where clients prefer not to manage the paperwork, or where the application is more complex than it first appears.

"A bigger firm is probably safer."

Larger practices are better suited to complex commercial litigation or corporate restructuring. For administrative and advisory matters of the kind we handle, firm size does not correspond to outcome quality. Continuity and preparation are more determinative.

"Legal advice in Japan requires an attorney."

Japan has several categories of licensed professional, each authorised for different types of work. Administrative scriveners, judicial scriveners, and certified specialists are authorised for particular matters that do not require a bengoshi. We are clear about the authorisation relevant to each service we offer.

A brief summary

For individuals managing documentation

Residency applications, consumer disputes, and overseas documentation are the areas where this practice operates. Each service is defined and priced before work begins.

For companies with employee documentation needs

We assist companies handling residency applications for staff in Japan — preparing documentation and managing correspondence with the immigration bureau.

For matters involving overseas institutions

Apostille, notarial, and consular procedures require coordination across institutions. We handle this directly where permitted and provide realistic timelines for steps we do not control.

Questions about whether this is the right approach for your matter?

Write to us with a brief description. We will indicate whether your situation falls within what we handle, and if not, point you toward a more suitable route.

Get in touch